Im glad to see eHarmony answering within recognized blog to articles titled “Marriage-Maker Claims tend to be Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street log. The WSJ article examines some of the matrimony data circulated by dating sites like eHarmony along with the methodology familiar with estimate such stats. We chatted a little about it topic and, a month or more ago when the initial WSJ article was actually published (see Story).

The WSJ post did not check out kindly regarding the stats circulated by internet dating sites, and also for the most part we agree with the author. Individuals needs knowing exactly how these stats are generated. Of all the online dating sites mentioned when you look at the WSJ article, “eHarmony stands apart as among the list of more mindful people”. This isn’t just a glowing report for eHarmony very, they made a decision to post a response to their blog.

In eHarmony blog post each goes into further precisely how they calculated that their particular dating site ended up being in charge of 2percent of marriages in america, from 12-month period finishing March 2007. A good many details we currently realized about from a previously revealed PDF file titled “eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 wedding Metrics range eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), nevertheless post does cleanse a few more details. What this web site blog post does program is, eHarmony is trying getting as available and clear with their research findings as is possible. In my opinion the name “Open correspondence” may certainly end up being the ideal choice for any recognized eHarmony weblog.

Here is the complete eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street diary on how they determine their particular relationship research. For further information about this dating website, study all of our post on eHarmony.